PRIVATE LANDLORDS- CHANGE IN LAW THIS
YEAR
Thursday 23 August 2012 by Keith Parr
Landlords of privately owned
properties enter into Assured Shorthold Tenancy Agreements with tenants.
Such landlords need to decide
whether they want to obtain a deposit from the tenants so it can be utilised in
the event, for example, of there being damage to the property when the tenant
leaves.
However, if a deposit is paid by
the tenant to the landlord on commencement of the tenancy the landlord must
join a Tenancy Deposit Scheme so that the deposit is protected and returned to
the tenant unless the landlord has a legitimate claim on the deposit and to
resolve disputes using alternative dispute resolution as opposed to court
proceedings. Such schemes have to be
strictly complied with within time limits and there are serious consequences of
failing to do so. Therefore, some
landlords decide that it is better not to take a deposit.
It is important to understand
what constitutes a deposit.
A deposit is a lump sum which the tenant is required to pay before the keys
are handed over and the tenant can move into the property. Any money that is
taken by the landlord as security for the tenant’s liabilities is deemed to be
a deposit. For example, it therefore includes payments described as a “cleaning
fee” which is to be repaid to the tenant at the end of the tenancy if the
property is clean. Or, additional money charged as rent each month to offset
against potential costs of cleaning and repairs even if it is not described as
such in the Tenancy Agreement and even if there is clear provision for the
money to be repaid to the tenant at the end of the term. Even a charge of two or more months for rent
in advance at the start term of the tenancy can amount to a deposit.
Prescribed information has to be
provided by the landlord to the tenant within a specified period.
There are potentially significant
sanctions for non-compliance including: -
1.
The landlord may be prevented from recovering
possession of its property by giving notice under section 21 of the Housing Act
1988 unless the deposit has been returned to the tenant, and
2.
The landlord may be required to pay money to the tenant
by way of a fine equal to between 1 and 3 times the amount of the deposit.
As a
result of a change in the law earlier this year late compliance does not
prevent a fine being imposed.
The
change in law can have serious consequences where an Assured Shorthold Tenancy
was created before the change in law on 6 April of this year as the extended
period given to provide the prescribed information expired some time ago now.
Before
taking any action I would suggest that you obtain advice from me, Keith Parr,
Head of the Litigation Department of Blackhurst Swainson Goodier LLP , by
telephoning 01772 253841. kgp@bsglaw.co.uk.
Visit our
website www.bsglaw.co.uk.
No comments:
Post a Comment